In recent months, the activities of First Ladies and non-governmental organisations across Nigeria have once again drawn attention to the expanding role they play in social welfare delivery.
From food outreaches and health interventions to support for widows, orphans, the elderly, and persons with disabilities, these efforts have provided much-needed relief at a time when economic hardship continues to bite hard. While these interventions are commendable, they also highlight deeper questions about governance, sustainability, and the responsibility of the state.
Across several states, First Ladies have marked personal milestones and public campaigns with large-scale humanitarian outreaches. In Delta State, for instance, the governor’s wife recently celebrated her birthday by distributing food items and essentials to elderly citizens and other vulnerable groups in multiple communities.
Similar initiatives have been seen in Lagos, Ogun, Akwa Ibom, and Kano, where First Ladies have used their platforms to support maternal health, women empowerment, child welfare, and poverty alleviation. These gestures resonate strongly with beneficiaries, many of whom see such visits as rare moments when leadership feels close and compassionate.
NGOs have also remained at the forefront of social intervention. In the aftermath of flooding in parts of the North and the Niger Delta, humanitarian organisations stepped in to provide shelter, food, and medical care to displaced families. During recent economic shocks triggered by subsidy removal and inflation, civil society groups organised food banks, skills-training programmes, and small grants to help vulnerable households cope. In many communities, these organisations have become the most visible safety net.
Yet, the prominence of First Ladies and NGOs in welfare delivery exposes a troubling reality: government systems meant to provide social protection remain weak. Social welfare should not depend largely on charity, goodwill, or the personal interests of those in power. While relief materials and empowerment programmes offer short-term comfort, they cannot replace comprehensive policies that address poverty, unemployment, healthcare access, and education on a sustainable basis.
There is also the challenge of continuity. Projects driven by First Ladies often end when administrations change, leaving beneficiaries uncertain about the future. NGOs, on the other hand, frequently struggle with funding constraints and limited reach, making their interventions uneven across regions. Without institutional backing, many well-meaning programmes fail to achieve long-term impact.
Accountability is another issue that cannot be ignored. While some foundations and NGOs operate transparently, others function with minimal public oversight. In a time when public trust in institutions is fragile, openness about funding sources, project execution, and measurable outcomes is essential to maintain credibility.
None of this diminishes the positive impact of recent humanitarian efforts. For many Nigerians battling hunger, displacement, and neglect, these interventions have been lifesaving. They reflect empathy and a human face of leadership that citizens yearn for. However, compassion should complement governance, not replace it.
The current moment offers an opportunity for better alignment. Government agencies must take the lead in building strong, institutionalised social welfare systems, while First Ladies and NGOs should collaborate with relevant ministries to ensure their programmes are sustainable, coordinated, and far-reaching.
Ultimately, a nation of over 200 million people cannot rely on ad hoc charity to care for its most vulnerable. Recent events remind us that while kindness matters, only effective policies, accountable institutions, and inclusive governance can deliver lasting social welfare for Nigerians.
Read also: Delta First Lady Hosts Royal Wives, Charges Them to Fight Against GBV, Drug Abuse
